Hmmm. I see the benefit in that, but at the same time I'm worried about phrasing it so it doesn't come across as "this perfume is safe for all migraineurs". "sensitivity: reported reaction" and "sensitivity: reported no reaction", maybe? Or "reaction: triggered" and "reaction: not triggered"? Or maybe somebody can come up with something better, because I'm looking more for something about the individual, not the perfume. Basically, I'd want to say "at least one person with scent sensitivity reported this as a problem" and "at least one person with scent sensitivity reported this as no problem", and if both tags wind up on the same scent, it's just even more of a "people's reactions are individual" thing whereas if only one winds up on an entry it only implies something about how the person/persons who did the review reacted, not an innate quality of the perfume.
no subject
Hmmm. I see the benefit in that, but at the same time I'm worried about phrasing it so it doesn't come across as "this perfume is safe for all migraineurs". "sensitivity: reported reaction" and "sensitivity: reported no reaction", maybe? Or "reaction: triggered" and "reaction: not triggered"? Or maybe somebody can come up with something better, because I'm looking more for something about the individual, not the perfume. Basically, I'd want to say "at least one person with scent sensitivity reported this as a problem" and "at least one person with scent sensitivity reported this as no problem", and if both tags wind up on the same scent, it's just even more of a "people's reactions are individual" thing whereas if only one winds up on an entry it only implies something about how the person/persons who did the review reacted, not an innate quality of the perfume.
If that makes any sense!